Selasa, 26 Januari 2010

HOSPITAL BY LAWS

Peraturan Internal Rumah Sakit (Hospital By-laws)


Budi Sampurna
Departemen Ilmu Kedoteran Forensik dan Medikolegal FKUI
Jl. Salemba Raya No 6
Jakarta Pusat 10430

Sebagaimana pengertiannya, by-laws adalah regulations, ordinances, rules or laws adopted by an association or corporation or the like for its government. 1 Dengan demikian hospital by-laws dalam arti luas adalah segala ketentuan, baik berupa statuta atau AD-ART, peraturan, standar dll yang dibuat oleh dan diberlakukan untuk sesuatu rumah sakit tertentu. Sedangkan hospital by-laws dalam arti sempit adalah ketentuan yang menjelaskan tentang tata-hubungan antara pemilik rumah sakit, manajemen rumah sakit dan komite medis.

Hospital by-laws bukanlah suatu peraturan yang standar dan berlaku atau dapat diterapkan begitu saja bagi setiap rumah sakit, namun juga bukan suatu peraturan yang berisi ketentuan yang sangat individual atau bahkan bertentangan dengan hospital by-laws pada umumnya. Hospital by-laws dibuat dengan mengacu kepada peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku, terutama di bidang hukum perdata dan hukum ketenagakerjaan. Oleh karena itu sangat dianjurkan kepada yang berkepentingan di rumah sakit yang akan membuatnya untuk berkonsultasi dengan ahli hukum, terutama yang mengenal hukum kedokteran. 2

Minggu, 24 Januari 2010

Therapi TBC

PENGOBATAN TBC

Pengobatan TBC Kriteria I (Tidak pernah terinfeksi, ada riwayat kontak, tidak menderita TBC) dan II (Terinfeksi TBC/test tuberkulin (+), tetapi tidak menderita TBC (gejala TBC tidak ada, radiologi tidak mendukung dan bakteriologi negatif) memerlukan pencegahan dengan pemberian INH 5–10 mg/kgbb/hari.

  1. Pencegahan (profilaksis) primer
    Anak yang kontak erat dengan penderita TBC BTA (+).
    INH minimal 3 bulan walaupun uji tuberkulin (-).
    Terapi profilaksis dihentikan bila hasil uji tuberkulin ulang menjadi (-) atau sumber penularan TB aktif sudah tidak ada.
  2. Pencegahan (profilaksis) sekunder
    Anak dengan infeksi TBC yaitu uji tuberkulin (+) tetapi tidak ada gejala sakit TBC.
    Profilaksis diberikan selama 6-9 bulan.

Obat yang digunakan untuk TBC digolongkan atas dua kelompok yaitu :

  • Obat primer : INH (isoniazid), Rifampisin, Etambutol, Streptomisin, Pirazinamid.
    Memperlihatkan efektifitas yang tinggi dengan toksisitas yang masih dapat ditolerir, sebagian besar penderita dapat disembuhkan dengan obat-obat ini.
  • Obat sekunder : Exionamid, Paraaminosalisilat, Sikloserin, Amikasin, Kapreomisin dan Kanamisin.

Dosis obat antituberkulosis (OAT)

Obat Dosis harian
(mg/kgbb/hari)
Dosis 2x/minggu
(mg/kgbb/hari)
Dosis 3x/minggu
(mg/kgbb/hari)
INH 5-15 (maks 300 mg) 15-40 (maks. 900 mg) 15-40 (maks. 900 mg)
Rifampisin 10-20 (maks. 600 mg) 10-20 (maks. 600 mg) 15-20 (maks. 600 mg)
Pirazinamid 15-40 (maks. 2 g) 50-70 (maks. 4 g) 15-30 (maks. 3 g)
Etambutol 15-25 (maks. 2,5 g) 50 (maks. 2,5 g) 15-25 (maks. 2,5 g)
Streptomisin 15-40 (maks. 1 g) 25-40 (maks. 1,5 g) 25-40 (maks. 1,5 g)

Sejak 1995, program Pemberantasan Penyakit TBC di Indonesia mengalami perubahan manajemen operasional, disesuaikan dengan strategi global yanng direkomendasikan oleh WHO. Langkah ini dilakukan untuk menindaklanjuti Indonesia – WHO joint Evaluation dan National Tuberkulosis Program in Indonesia pada April 1994. Dalam program ini, prioritas ditujukan pada peningkatan mutu pelayanan dan penggunaan obat yang rasional untuk memutuskan rantai penularan serta mencegah meluasnya resistensi kuman TBC di masyarakat. Program ini dilakukan dengan cara mengawasi pasien dalam menelan obat setiap hari,terutama pada fase awal pengobatan.

Strategi DOTS (Directly Observed Treatment Short-course) pertama kali diperkenalkan pada tahun 1996 dan telah diimplementasikan secara meluas dalam sistem pelayanan kesehatan masyarakat. Sampai dengan tahun 2001, 98% dari populasi penduduk dapat mengakses pelayanan DOTS di puskesmas. Strategi ini diartikan sebagai "pengawasan langsung menelan obat jangka pendek oleh pengawas pengobatan" setiap hari.

Indonesia adalah negara high burden, dan sedang memperluas strategi DOTS dengan cepat, karenanya baseline drug susceptibility data (DST) akan menjadi alat pemantau dan indikator program yang amat penting. Berdasarkan data dari beberapa wilayah, identifikasi dan pengobatan TBC melalui Rumah Sakit mencapai 20-50% dari kasus BTA positif, dan lebih banyak lagi untuk kasus BTA negatif. Jika tidak bekerja sama dengan Puskesmas, maka banyak pasien yang didiagnosis oleh RS memiliki risiko tinggi dalam kegagalan pengobatan, dan mungkin menimbulkan kekebalan obat.

Akibat kurang baiknya penanganan pengobatan penderita TBC dan lemahnya implementasi strategi DOTS. Penderita yang mengidap BTA yang resisten terhadap OAT akan menyebarkan infeksi TBC dengan kuman yang bersifat MDR (Multi-drugs Resistant). Untuk kasus MDR-TB dibutuhkan obat lain selain obat standard pengobatan TBC yaitu obat fluorokuinolon seperti siprofloksasin, ofloxacin, levofloxacin (hanya sangat disayangkan bahwa obat ini tidak dianjurkan pada anak dalam masa pertumbuhan).

Pengobatan TBC pada orang dewasa
  • Kategori 1 : 2HRZE/4H3R3
    Selama 2 bulan minum obat INH, rifampisin, pirazinamid, dan etambutol setiap hari (tahap intensif), dan 4 bulan selanjutnya minum obat INH dan rifampisin tiga kali dalam seminggu (tahap lanjutan).
    Diberikan kepada:
    • Penderita baru TBC paru BTA positif.
    • Penderita TBC ekstra paru (TBC di luar paru-paru) berat.
  • Kategori 2 : HRZE/5H3R3E3
    Diberikan kepada:
    • Penderita kambuh.
    • Penderita gagal terapi.
    • Penderita dengan pengobatan setelah lalai minum obat.
  • Kategori 3 : 2HRZ/4H3R3
    Diberikan kepada:
    • Penderita BTA (+) dan rontgen paru mendukung aktif.

Pengobatan TBC pada anak

Adapun dosis untuk pengobatan TBC jangka pendek selama 6 atau 9 bulan, yaitu:

  1. 2HR/7H2R2 : INH+Rifampisin setiap hari selama 2 bulan pertama, kemudian INH +Rifampisin setiap hari atau 2 kali seminggu selama 7 bulan (ditambahkan Etambutol bila diduga ada resistensi terhadap INH).
  2. 2HRZ/4H2R2 : INH+Rifampisin+Pirazinamid: setiap hari selama 2 bulan pertama, kemudian INH+Rifampisin setiap hari atau 2 kali seminggu selama 4 bulan (ditambahkan Etambutol bila diduga ada resistensi terhadap INH).

Pengobatan TBC pada anak-anak jika INH dan rifampisin diberikan bersamaan, dosis maksimal perhari INH 10 mg/kgbb dan rifampisin 15 mg/kgbb.

Dosis anak INH dan rifampisin yang diberikan untuk kasus:

TB tidak berat

INH : 5 mg/kgbb/hari
Rifampisin : 10 mg/kgbb/hari

TB berat (milier dan meningitis TBC)

INH : 10 mg/kgbb/hari
Rifampisin : 15 mg/kgbb/hari
Dosis prednison : 1-2 mg/kgbb/hari (maks. 60 mg)

TBC

TBC

Tuberkulosis (TBC atau TB) adalah suatu penyakit infeksi yang disebabkan oleh bakteri Mikobakterium tuberkulosa. Bakteri ini merupakan bakteri basil yang sangat kuat sehingga memerlukan waktu lama untuk mengobatinya. Bakteri ini lebih sering menginfeksi organ paru-paru dibandingkan bagian lain tubuh manusia.

Insidensi TBC dilaporkan meningkat secara drastis pada dekade terakhir ini di seluruh dunia. Demikian pula di Indonesia, Tuberkulosis / TBC merupakan masalah kesehatan, baik dari sisi angka kematian (mortalitas), angka kejadian penyakit (morbiditas), maupun diagnosis dan terapinya. Dengan penduduk lebih dari 200 juta orang, Indonesia menempati urutan ketiga setelah India dan China dalam hal jumlah penderita di antara 22 negara dengan masalah TBC terbesar di dunia.

Hasil survei Kesehatan Rumah Tangga Depkes RI tahun 1992, menunjukkan bahwa Tuberkulosis / TBC merupakan penyakit kedua penyebab kematian, sedangkan pada tahun 1986 merupakan penyebab kematian keempat. Pada tahun 1999 WHO Global Surveillance memperkirakan di Indonesia terdapat 583.000 penderita Tuberkulosis / TBC baru pertahun dengan 262.000 BTA positif atau insidens rate kira-kira 130 per 100.000 penduduk. Kematian akibat Tuberkulosis / TBC diperkirakan menimpa 140.000 penduduk tiap tahun.

Jumlah penderita TBC paru dari tahun ke tahun di Indonesia terus meningkat. Saat ini setiap menit muncul satu penderita baru TBC paru, dan setiap dua menit muncul satu penderita baru TBC paru yang menular. Bahkan setiap empat menit sekali satu orang meninggal akibat TBC di Indonesia.

Kenyataan mengenai penyakit TBC di Indonesia begitu mengkhawatirkan, sehingga kita harus waspada sejak dini & mendapatkan informasi lengkap tentang penyakit TBC . Simak semua informasi mengenai penyakit TBC, pengobatan TBC, Uji TBC dan Klasifikasi TBC, Obat TBC dan pertanyaan seputar TBC yang ada di website ini.

Kamis, 17 September 2009

Acute coronary syndrome


An acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a set of signs and symptoms (syndrome) related to the heart. ACS is compatible with a diagnosis of acute myocardial ischemia,[1] but it is not pathognomonic.

The sub-types of acute coronary syndrome include unstable angina (UA, not associated with heart muscle damage), and two forms of myocardial infarction (MI, heart attack), in which heart muscle is damaged. These types are named according to the appearance of the electrocardiogram (ECG/EKG) as non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).[2] There can be some variation as to which forms of MI are classified under acute coronary syndrome.[3]

ACS should be distinguished from stable angina, which develops during exertion and resolves at rest. In contrast with stable angina, unstable angina occurs suddenly, often at rest or with minimal exertion, or at lesser degrees of exertion than the individual's previous angina ("crescendo angina"). New onset angina is also considered unstable angina, since it suggests a new problem in a coronary artery.

Though ACS is usually associated with coronary thrombosis, it can also be associated with cocaine use.[4] Cardiac chest pain can also be precipitated by anemia, bradycardias (excessively slow heart rate) or tachycardias (excessively fast heart rate).

Contents

[hide]

[edit] Signs and symptoms

The cardinal sign of decreased blood flow to the heart is chest pain experienced as tightness around the chest and radiating to the left arm and the left angle of the jaw. This may be associated with diaphoresis (sweating), nausea and vomiting, as well as shortness of breath. In many cases, the sensation is "atypical", with pain experienced in different ways or even being completely absent (which is more likely in female patients and those with diabetes). Some may report palpitations, anxiety or a sense of impending doom and a feeling of being acutely ill.

[edit] Diagnosis

Classification of acute coronary syndromes.[5]

[edit] Electrocardiogram

In the setting of acute chest pain, the electrocardiogram is the investigation that most reliably distinguishes between various causes.[6] If this indicates acute heart damage (elevation in the ST segment, new left bundle branch block), treatment for a heart attack in the form of angioplasty or thrombolysis is indicated immediately (see below). In the absence of such changes, it is not possible to immediately distinguish between unstable angina and NSTEMI.

[edit] Imaging and blood tests

As it is only one of the many potential causes of chest pain, the patient usually has a number of tests in the emergency department, such as a chest X-ray, blood tests (including myocardial markers such as troponin I or T, and a D-dimer if a pulmonary embolism is suspected), and telemetry (monitoring of the heart rhythm).

[edit] Prediction scores

The ACI-TIPI score can be used to aid diagnosis; using 7 variables from the admission record, this score predicts crudely which patients are likely to have myocardial ischemia.[7]

[edit] Prognosis

[edit] TIMI score

The TIMI risk score can identify high risk patients[8] and has been independently validated.[9][10]

[edit] Biomarkers for diagnosis

The aim of diagnostic markers is to identify patients with ACS even when there is no evidence of myocyte necrosis.

  • Ischemia-Modified Albumin (IMA) - In cases of Ischemia - Albumin undergoes a conformational change and loses its ability to bind transitional metals (copper or cobalt). IMA can be used to assess the proportion of modified albumin in ischemia. Its use is limited to ruling out ischemia rather than a diagnostic test for the occurrence of ischemia.
  • Myeloperoxidase (MPO) - The levels of circulating MPO, a leukocyte enzyme, elevate early after ACS and can be used as an early marker for the condition.
  • Glycogen Phosphorylase Isoenzyme BB-(GPBB) is an early marker of cardiac ischemia and is one of three isoenzyme of Glycogen Phosphorylase.
  • Troponin is a late cardiac marker of ACS

[edit] Biomarkers for Risk Stratification

The aim of prognostic markers is to reflect different components of pathophysiology of ACS. For example:

  • Natriuretic peptide - Both B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal Pro BNP can be applied to predict the risk of death and heart failure following ACS.
  • Monocyte chemo attractive protein (MCP)-1 - has been shown in a number of studies to identify patients with a higher risk of adverse outcomes after ACS.

[edit] Treatment

[edit] STEMI

If the ECG confirms changes suggestive of myocardial infarction (ST elevations in specific leads, a new left bundle branch block or a true posterior MI pattern), thrombolytics may be administered or primary coronary angioplasty may be performed. In the former, medication is injected that stimulates fibrinolysis, destroying blood clots obstructing the coronary arteries. In the latter, a flexible catheter is passed via the femoral or radial arteries and advanced to the heart to identify blockages in the coronaries. When occlusions are found, they can be intervened upon mechanically with angioplasty and usually stent deployment if a lesion, termed the culprit lesion, is thought to be causing myocardial damage.

[edit] NSTEMI and NSTE-ACS

If the ECG does not show typical changes, the term "non-ST segment elevation ACS" is applied. The patient may still have suffered a "non-ST elevation MI" (NSTEMI). The accepted management of unstable angina and acute coronary syndrome is therefore empirical treatment with aspirin, heparin (usually a low-molecular weight heparin such as enoxaparin) and clopidogrel, with intravenous glyceryl trinitrate and opioids if the pain persists.

A blood test is generally performed for cardiac troponins twelve hours after onset of the pain. If this is positive, coronary angiography is typically performed on an urgent basis, as this is highly predictive of a heart attack in the near-future. If the troponin is negative, a treadmill exercise test or a thallium scintigram may be requested.

Cocaine associated ACS should be managed in a manner similar to other patients with acute coronary syndrome except beta blockers should not be used and benzodiazepines should be administered early.[11]

[edit] Prevention

Acute coronary syndrome often reflects a degree of damage to the coronaries by atherosclerosis. Primary prevention of atherosclerosis is controlling the risk factors: healthy eating, exercise, treatment for hypertension and diabetes, avoiding smoking and controlling cholesterol levels; in patients with significant risk factors, aspirin has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events. Secondary prevention is discussed in myocardial infarction.

After a ban on smoking in all enclosed public places was introduced in Scotland in March 2006, there was a 17 percent reduction in hospital admissions for acute coronary syndrome. 67% of the decrease occurred in non-smokers.[12]

[edit] References

  1. ^ "Acute Coronary Syndrome". http://www.americanheart.org/presenter.jhtml?identifier=3010002.
  2. ^ Grech ED, Ramsdale DR (June 2003). "Acute coronary syndrome: unstable angina and non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction". BMJ 326 (7401): 1259–61. doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7401.1259. PMID 12791748. PMC: 1126130. http://bmj.com/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=12791748.
  3. ^ "Dorlands Medical Dictionary:acute coronary syndrome". http://www.mercksource.com/pp/us/cns/cns_hl_dorlands_split.jsp?pg=/ppdocs/us/common/dorlands/dorland/nine/14170699.htm.
  4. ^ Achar SA, Kundu S, Norcross WA (2005). "Diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome". Am Fam Physician 72 (1): 119–26. PMID 16035692. http://www.aafp.org/afp/20050701/119.html.
  5. ^ Alpert JS, Thygesen K, Antman E, Bassand JP. (2000). "Myocardial infarction redefined--a consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction". J Am Coll Cardiol 36 (3): 959–69. doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00804-4. PMID 10987628.
  6. ^ Chun AA, McGee SR (2004). "Bedside diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a systematic review". Am. J. Med. 117 (5): 334–43. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.03.021. PMID 15336583.
  7. ^ Selker HP, Griffith JL, D'Agostino RB (1991). "A tool for judging coronary care unit admission appropriateness, valid for both real-time and retrospective use. A time-insensitive predictive instrument (TIPI) for acute cardiac ischemia: a multicenter study". Medical care 29 (7): 610–27. PMID 2072767.
  8. ^ Antman EM, Cohen M, Bernink PJ, et al. (2000). "The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI: A method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making". JAMA 284 (7): 835–42. doi:10.1001/jama.284.7.835. PMID 10938172.
  9. ^ Pollack CV, Sites FD, Shofer FS, Sease KL, Hollander JE (2006). "Application of the TIMI risk score for unstable angina and non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome to an unselected emergency department chest pain population". Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine 13 (1): 13–8. doi:10.1197/j.aem.2005.06.031. PMID 16365321.
  10. ^ Chase M, Robey JL, Zogby KE, Sease KL, Shofer FS, Hollander JE (2006). "Prospective validation of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Risk Score in the emergency department chest pain population". Annals of emergency medicine 48 (3): 252–9. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.01.032. PMID 16934646.
  11. ^ McCord J, Jneid H, Hollander JE, et al. (April 2008). "Management of cocaine-associated chest pain and myocardial infarction: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Acute Cardiac Care Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology". Circulation 117 (14): 1897–907. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.188950. PMID 18347214.
  12. ^ Pell JP, Haw S, Cobbe S et al. (2008). "Smoke-free Legislation and Hospitalizations for Acute Coronary Syndrome". New England Journal of Medicine 359: 482. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa0706740.

Minggu, 14 Juni 2009

DENGUE FEVER

Perspectives

Dengue (DF) and dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF) are caused by one of four closely related, but antigenically distinct, virus serotypes (DEN-1, DEN-2, DEN-3, and DEN-4), of the genus Flavivirus. Infection with one of these serotypes provides immunity to only that serotype for life, so persons living in a dengue-endemic area can have more than one dengue infection during their lifetime. DF and DHF are primarily diseases of tropical and sub tropical areas, and the four different dengue serotypes are maintained in a cycle that involves humans and the Aedes mosquito. However, Aedes aegypti, a domestic, day-biting mosquito that prefers to feed on humans, is the most common Aedes species. Infections produce a spectrum of clinical illness ranging from a nonspecific viral syndrome to severe and fatal hemorrhagic disease. Important risk factors for DHF include the strain of the infecting virus, as well as the age, and especially the prior dengue infection history of the patient.

History of Dengue
Return to top of page

The first reported epidemics of DF occurred in 1779-1780 in Asia, Africa, and North America. The near simultaneous occurrence of outbreaks on three continents indicates that these viruses and their mosquito vector have had a worldwide distribution in the tropics for more than 200 years. During most of this time, DF was considered a mild, nonfatal disease of visitors to the tropics. Generally, there were long intervals (10-40 years) between major epidemics, mainly because the introduction of a new serotype in a susceptible population occurred only if viruses and their mosquito vector could survive the slow transport between population centers by sailing vessels.

A pandemic of dengue began in Southeast Asia after World War II and has spread around the globe since then. Epidemics caused by multiple serotypes (hyperendemicity) are more frequent, the geographic distribution of dengue viruses and their mosquito vectors has expanded, and DHF has emerged in the Pacific region and the Americas. In Southeast Asia, epidemic DHF first appeared in the 1950s, but by 1975 it had become a frequent cause of hospitalization and death among children in many countries in that region.

Current Trends
Return to top of page

In the 1980s, DHF began a second expansion into Asia when Sri Lanka, India, and the Maldive Islands had their first major DHF epidemics; Pakistan first reported an epidemic of dengue fever in 1994. The epidemics in Sri Lanka and India were associated with multiple dengue virus serotypes, but DEN-3 was predominant and was genetically distinct from DEN-3 viruses previously isolated from infected persons in those countries. After an absence of 35 years, epidemic dengue fever reemerged in both Taiwan and the People's Republic of China in the 1980s. The People's Republic of China had a series of epidemics caused by all four serotypes, and its first major epidemic of DHF, caused by DEN-2, was reported on Hainan Island in 1985. Singapore also had a resurgence of dengue/DHF from 1990 to 1994 after a successful control program had prevented significant transmission for over 20 years. In other countries of Asia where DHF is endemic, the epidemics have become progressively larger in the last 15 years.

In the Pacific, dengue viruses were reintroduced in the early 1970s after an absence of more than 25 years. Epidemic activity caused by all four serotypes has intensified in recent years with major epidemics of DHF on several islands.

Despite poor surveillance for dengue in Africa, epidemic dengue fever caused by all four serotypes has increased dramatically since 1980. Most activity has occurred in East Africa, and major epidemics were reported for the first time in the Seychelles (1977), Kenya (1982, DEN-2), Mozambique (1985, DEN-3), Djibouti (1991-92, DEN-2), Somalia (1982, 1993, DEN-2), and Saudi Arabia (1994, DEN-2). Epidemic DHF has not been reported in Africa or the Middle East, but sporadic cases clinically compatible with DHF have been reported from Mozambique, Djibouti, and Saudi Arabia.

The emergence of dengue/DHF as a major public health problem has been most dramatic in the American region. In an effort to prevent urban yellow fever, which is also transmitted by Ae. aegypti, the Pan American Health Organization started a campaign that eradicated Ae. aegypti from most Central and South American countries in the 1950s and 1960s. As a result, epidemic dengue occurred only sporadically in some Caribbean islands during this period. The Ae. aegypti eradication program, which was officially discontinued in the United States in 1970, gradually weakened elsewhere, and the mosquito began to reinfest countries from which it had been eradicated. As a result, the geographic distribution of Ae. aegypti in 2002 was much wider than that before the eradication program (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Distribution of Aedes aegypti (red shaded areas) in the Americas in 1970, at the end of the mosquito eradication program, and in 2002.

In 1970, only DEN-2 virus was present in the Americas, although DEN-3 may have had a focal distribution in Colombia and Puerto Rico. In 1977, DEN-1 was introduced and caused major epidemics throughout the region over a 16-year period. DEN-4 was introduced in 1981 and caused similar widespread epidemics. Also in 1981, a new strain of DEN-2 from Southeast Asia caused the first major DHF epidemic in the Americas (Cuba). This strain has spread rapidly throughout the region and has caused outbreaks of DHF in Venezuela, Colombia, Brazil, French Guiana, Suriname, and Puerto Rico. By 2003, 24 countries in the American region had reported confirmed DHF cases (Figure 2), and DHF is now endemic in many of these countries.

Figure 2. American countries with laboratory-confirmed dengue hemorrhagic fever (red shaded areas), prior to 1981 and from 1981 to 2003.

DEN-3 virus reappeared in the Americas after an absence of 16 years. This serotype was first detected in association with a 1994 dengue/DHF epidemic in Nicaragua. Almost simultaneously, DEN-3 was confirmed in Panama and, in early 1995, in Costa Rica.

Viral envelope gene sequence data from the DEN-3 strains isolated from Panama and Nicaragua have shown that this new American DEN-3 virus strain was likely a recent introduction from Asia since it is genetically distinct from the DEN-3 strain found previously in the Americas, but is identical to the DEN-3 virus serotype that caused major DHF epidemics in Sri Lanka and India in the 1980s. As suggested by the finding of a new DEN-3 strain, and the susceptibility of the population in the American tropics to it DEN-3 spread rapidly throughout the region causing major epidemics of dengue/DHF in Central America in 1995.

Figure 3. Presence of DEN-3 in the Americas from 1994 to 2003

In 2005, dengue is the most important mosquito-borne viral disease affecting humans; its global distribution is comparable to that of malaria, and an estimated 2.5 billion people live in areas at risk for epidemic transmission (Figure 4). Each year, tens of millions of cases of DF occur and, depending on the year, up to hundreds of thousands of cases of DHF. The case-fatality rate of DHF in most countries is about 5%, but this can be reduced to less than 1% with proper treatment. Most fatal cases are among children and young adults.

Figure 4. World distribution of dengue viruses and their mosquito vector, Aedes aegypti, in 2008.

There is a small risk for dengue outbreaks in the continental United States. Two competent mosquito vectors, Ae. aegypti and Aedes albopictus, are present and, under certain circumstances, each could transmit dengue viruses. This type of transmission has been detected six times in the last 25 years in south Texas (1980 -2004) and has been associated with dengue epidemics in northern Mexico by Aedes aegypti and in Hawaii (2001-02) due to Ae. albopictus. Moreover, numerous viruses are introduced annually by travelers returning from tropical areas where dengue viruses are endemic. From 1977 to 2004, a total of 3,806 suspected cases of imported dengue were reported in the United States. Although some specimens collected were not adequate for laboratory diagnosis, 864 (23%) cases were confirmed as dengue. Many more cases probably go unreported each year because surveillance in the United States is passive and relies on physicians to recognize the disease, inquire about the patient's travel history, obtain proper diagnostic samples, and report the case. These data suggest that states in southern and southeastern United States, where Ae. aegypti is found, are at risk for dengue transmission and sporadic outbreaks.

Although travel-associated dengue and limited outbreaks do occur in the continental United States, most dengue cases in US citizens occur as endemic transmission among residents in some of the US territories. CDC conducts laboratory-based passive surveillance in Puerto Rico in collaboration with the Puerto Rico Department of Health. The weekly surveillance report from this collaboration can be found at: Dengue Surveillance Report

The reasons for the dramatic global emergence of DF/DHF as a major public health problem are complex and not well understood. However, several important factors can be identified.

  1. First, major global demographic changes have occurred, the most important of which have been uncontrolled urbanization and concurrent population growth. These demographic changes have resulted in substandard housing and inadequate water, sewer, and waste management systems, all of which increase Ae. aegypti population densities and facilitate transmission of Ae. aegypti-borne disease.
  2. In most countries the public health infrastructure has deteriorated. Limited financial and human resources and competing priorities have resulted in a "crisis mentality" with emphasis on implementing so-called emergency control methods in response to epidemics rather than on developing programs to prevent epidemic transmission. This approach has been particularly detrimental to dengue control because, in most countries, surveillance is (just as in the U.S.) passive; the system to detect increased transmission normally relies on reports by local physicians who often do not consider dengue in their differential diagnoses. As a result, an epidemic has often reached or passed its peak before it is recognized.
  3. Increased travel by airplane provides the ideal mechanism for infected human transport of dengue viruses between population centers of the tropics, resulting in a frequent exchange of dengue viruses and other pathogens.
  4. Lastly, effective mosquito control is virtually nonexistent in most dengue-endemic countries. Considerable emphasis in the past has been placed on ultra-low-volume insecticide space sprays for adult mosquito control, a relatively ineffective approach for controlling Ae. aegypti.

Future Outlook
Return to top of page

No dengue vaccine is available. Recently, however, attenuated candidate vaccine viruses have been developed. Efficacy trials in human volunteers have yet to be initiated. Research is also being conducted to develop second-generation recombinant vaccine viruses. Therefore, an effective dengue vaccine for public use will not be available for 5 to 10 years.

Prospects for reversing the recent trend of increased epidemic activity and geographic expansion of dengue are not promising. New dengue virus strains and serotypes will likely continue to be introduced into many areas where the population densities of Ae. aegypti are at high levels. With no new mosquito control technology available, in recent years public health authorities have emphasized disease prevention and mosquito control through community efforts to reduce larval breeding sources. Although this approach will probably be effective in the long run, it is unlikely to impact disease transmission in the near future. We must, therefore, develop improved, proactive, laboratory-based surveillance systems that can provide early warning of an impending dengue epidemic. At the very least, surveillance results can alert the public to take action and physicians to diagnose and properly treat DF/DHF cases.

Glossary of terms

Return to top of page Return to top of page

Endemic - means a disease occurs continuously and with predictable regularity in a specific area or population .

Epidemic - a widespread outbreak of an infectious disease where many people are infected at the same time.

Igm - a protein that recognizes a particular epitope on an antigen and facilitates clearance of that antigen and is the primary antibody response to a viral infection

Outbreak - an epidemic limited to localized increase in the incidence of a disease, e.g., in a village, town, or closed institution

Pandemic - an epidemic occurring worldwide, or over a very wide area, crossing international boundaries, and usually affecting a large number of people.

Recombinant vaccine - using the technique of recombination to create an attenuated virus which elicits an immune response against the viral strain of interest in order to use as a vaccine in humans.

Seroytpe - a closely related set of viruses that can be differiented by the immune response they produce.

Viral envelope gene sequence - the nucleic acid composition in the envelope gene